Allegedly, Michelle Obama was born a biological man named Michael LaVaughn Robinson, then he changed his name to Michelle at 12 years old.
Barack Obama has referred to Michelle as “Michael” twice on national television (as you will see in the documentary embedded below), and Michelle has said this in an interview:
“When it comes to me, they get really, really ignorant. They believe that just because I have an Adam’s Apple that I’m not a real woman.”
As we all know, only men have an Adam’s apple, so by admitting to have an Adam’s apple, “she” actually admitted to being a biological man.
Barack Obama’s brother, Malik Obama, has also tweeted that the former US president is gay, was born in Kenya (and provided a copy of his birth certificate that supported his claim), and has said Michelle is actually a man and his name is Michael.
And then there are those who have stated publicly to have had sexual relationships to Barack Obama.
Read everything in great detail below:
Anybody can switch and become a Black woman or Black man at any time they want to, thanks to gender fluid social justice and trans-everything Leftist logic.
So maybe we should all declare we’re Black women, just like Michael “Michelle” Obama did, and then we’ll all be entitled to reparations, if and when they ever come. You can even use gender fluidity to steal your way to the top in politics.
It’s easy, you see, because allegedly, Michelle Obama was born a biological man named Michael LaVaughn Robinson, then he changed his name to Michelle at 12 years old.
Michael Robinson’s Tranny Conversion Into Michelle Obama
Michael Obama is said to have undergone surgery in his late 20s, just before he met Barack Hussein, who knew from the beginning about the real Michelle.
Michael was not going to begin that relationship based on a lie, so he told Barack, but he already knew. Their kids are all from Barack’s sperm but they’re surrogates. Michael is “mom” and that’s that.
“When it comes to me, they get really, really ignorant. They believe that just because I have an Adam’s Apple that I’m not a real woman.” [emphasis added]
The dead giveaway, when you’re trying to tell someone’s biological gender (that’s called science, by the way), is by taking a look at their laryngeal prominence or “neck triangle.”
Commonly known as the Adam’s apple, that’s the protrusion or “lump” formed by a certain angle of thyroid cartilage that surrounds and protects the larynx.
For adult males this secondary sexual characteristic is clearly visible and also palpable. This is related to the deepening of the voice, as it becomes accentuated during puberty.
There is cosmetic surgery, called chondrolaryngoplasy, that can be done to reshape the Adam’s apple by reducing some of the thyroid cartilage. But then there’s those big manly shoulders to contend with, when we’re speaking of Michael Obama (video source):https://www.youtube.com/embed/AtWBGLbH8tU?feature=oembed
Maybe everyone will think she works out really hard, and so the simplest solution to that cover-up problem is just don’t cover them up, ever.
Attention women seeking arms and shoulders like “Michelle” Obama, if you weren’t also born a man, it may be difficult to just work out and develop shoulders like an NFL linebacker.
From All The Possible Names In The World, Why Is Her Book Titled Becoming Michelle Obama?
And let’s not forget her recently published book. The cover reads Becoming Michelle Obama:
Rumours That Barack Obama Is Gay
And then there are the never-ending rumours about Barack Obama being gay (even a call boy when he was in college), that he was a member of a gay bath house in Chicago, and then there are the men who claim to have had sexual relationships with him.
Barack Obama Has Called Michelle “Michael” Twice On National Television, As You Will See In The Following, Extremely Revealing, Documentary:
Michael Still Has His Junk, Cause That Ain’t No Summer Sausage He’s Grabbin’
Watch Michael “Michelle” Obama shake his junk on the Ellen Show. That’s a package, unless “she” is just carrying “her” mace around her waist in “her” jock strap.https://www.youtube.com/embed/PgJaCYxnj8k?feature=oembedhttps://www.youtube.com/embed/F5ZGTQLx3TE?feature=oembed
Michelle Is A Biological Man, Says Barack Obama’s Brother Malik
Ooops. Did that get published? Yes, the brother of the infamous former president spilled the beans about the first gay president that we know about, and the first “First Man” to live in the White House.
Barack’s brother Malik posted tweets about Michelle really being Michael. After all, with hands that huge, an Adam’s apple, and shoulders that could lift the back end of a pickup truck off the ground, Malik was simply stating the obvious.
Here is a larger picture of the real birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, which proves that he was born in Kenya:
On March 7th, 2012, the Russian publication “Pravda” called out the U.S. press for its deliberate neglect of the largest scandal in modern American history.
Maricopa County, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio released credible forensic evidence that Barack Obama, presumed President of the United States, presented to the world a forged Birth Certificate on April 27th, 2011.
Since then, the scandal has only expanded. Former United States Postal Service worker Allen Hulton has recently come forward with compelling testimony given under Oath, which leads to only one conclusion: Barack Obama attended College in the United States as a Foreign Student.
But I digress.
Below is a tweet from Malik Obama who also suggested that Michelle Obama is actually a man:
Is that just a woman with thyroid problems and a big banana in her pocket for a snack later? Only his husband knows for sure.
What we do know for sure is that every day was opposite day for Barack Obama when he was in office for those long eight years, and he’s still lying through his teeth to get his senile cohort in the driver’s seat now.
GILAD ATZMON IS A JAZZ & WORLD MUSIC ARTIST, A NOVELIST AND AN AUTHOR FOCUSING ON ID POLITICS.
Last week we read about AIPAC’s assault against President Obama. It was reported that the Jewish Lobby in America took its gloves off. In the open, AIPAC decided to mount pressure on the American leadership and President Obama in particular.
“The Obama administration’s recent statements regarding the U.S. relationship with Israel is a matter of serious concern,” AIPAC said in its statement. AIPAC’s reaction came after a weekend of U.S. recriminations and demands, following Israel’s provocative announcement that it had given preliminary approval for the construction of 1,600 more apartments for Jewish settlers in a Palestinian neighborhood of eastern occupied Jerusalem. Unlike President Obama, who seems to be prioritizing issues like the health care reform bill and United States economic recovery, AIPAC claims to know what America’s ‘real’ interests are and how to achieve them. “The administration should make a conscious effort to move away from public demands and unilateral deadlines directed at Israel, with whom the United States shares basic, fundamental, and strategic interests”. AIPAC also suggested that theAmerican leadership should concentrate on a confrontation with Iran. “The escalated rhetoric of recent days only serves as a distraction from the substantive work that needs to be done with regard to the urgent issue of Iran’s rapid pursuit of nuclear weapons”.
Jewish lobbies certainly do not hold back when it comes to pressuring states, world leaders and even super powers. AIPAC’s behavior last week reminded me of the Jewish declaration of war against Nazi Germany in 1933.
Not many people are aware that in March 1933, long before Hitler became the undisputed leader of Germany and began restricting the rights of German Jews, the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest at Madison Square Gardens and called for an American boycott of German goods.
I obviously do not think that Obama has anything in common with Hitler. There is
not much the two leaders share in terms of their philosophy, their attitude to humanism or their view of world peace.(1) However, it is hard to turn a blind eye to the similarity between AIPAC’s behaviour last week and the Jewish American Congress’ conduct in 1933.
On March 24, 1933, The Daily Express (London) published an article announcing that the Jews had already launched their boycott against Germany and threatened a forthcoming “holy war”. The Express urged Jews everywhere to boycott German goods and demonstrate actively against German economic interests.
The Express said that Germany was “now confronted with an international boycott of its trade, its finances, and its industry….in London, New York, Paris and Warsaw, Jewish businessmen are united to go on an economic crusade.”
Jewish texts tend to glaze over the fact that Hitler’s March 28 1933, ordering a boycott against Jewish stores and goods, was an escalation in direct response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide Jewish leadership. In fact the only Jewish enclave that is willing to admit the historical order of events that led to the destruction of European Jewry, is the anti Zionist Jewish Orthodox sect known as the Torah Jews. I assume that, similarly, once things turn sour between America and its Jewish lobbies, Jewish tribal ideologists will be the first to forget that it was the Jewish American establishment that worked so hard to nourish the inevitable animosity.
If you wonder why Jewish politicians repeat exactly the same mistakes time after time, the answer is easy. Jews do not know their Jewish history for there is no Jewish history.
As it happens, Jewish history is a set of fables tied clumsily together to portray a false image of a victorious narrative. Jewish history is a set of blind spots bundled together by myth, fantasies and lies, in order to present the illusion of a coherent past narrative and a vague semblance of chronology. Israeli professor Shlomo Sand taught us that the Zionists, and to a certain extent their Bundist rivals, were far from being shy of “inventing” the history of their Jewish nationhood. But it goes further, even the holocaust, which could be a major illuminating corner in Jewish reflection, was transformed into a rigid chapter that perpetuated blindness. As a vision of the past, it is there to hide and to disguise, rather than to reveal and inform. In a Jewish history book, you won’t read about ‘Judea’s declaration of war against Nazi Germany’. In Jewish history texts chronology always launches when Jewish suffering begins. Jewish history transcends itself beyond the notion of causality. It persuades us that persecution of Jews occurs out of nowhere. The Jewish historical text avoids the necessary questions as to why hostility evolves time after time, why do Jews buy so many enemies and so easily?
AIPAC leaders are clearly repeating the grave mistakes of their forebearers: the American Jewish Congress. They do not learn from their history, for there is not a single Jewish history text to learn from. Instead of a history text, Jews have the Holocaust, an event that matured into a religion.
The holocaust religion is obviously Judeo-centric to the bone. It defines the Jewish Raison d’être. For the Jews it signifies a total fatigue of the Diaspora, it regards the Goy as a potential ‘irrational’ murderer. The new Jewish religion preaches revenge. It even establishes a new Jewish God. Instead of old Yehova, the new Jewish God is ‘the Jew’ himself: the brave and witty being, the one who survived the ultimate and most sinister genocide, the one who came out of the ashes and stepped forward into a new beginning.
To a certain extent the Holocaust religion signals the Jewish departure from monotheism, for every Jew is a potential little God or Goddess. Gilad Shalit is the God ‘innocence’, Abe Foxman is the God anti Semitism, Maddof is the God of swindling, Greenspan is the God of ‘good economy’, Lord Goldsmith is the God of the ‘green light’, Lord Levy is the God of fundraising, Wolfowitz is the God of new American expansionism and AIPAC is the American Olympus where American elected human beings come to ask for mercy and forgiveness for being Goyim and for daring to occasionally tell the truth about Israel.
The holocaust religion is the conclusive stage in the Jewish dialectic; it is the end of Jewish history for it is the deepest and most sincere form of ‘self love’. Rather than inventing an abstract God who prefers the Jews to be the chosen people, in the holocaust religion the Jews cut out the divine middle substance. The Jew just chooses oneself. This is why Jewish identity politics transcends itself beyond the notion of history. God is the master of ceremony. And the new Jewish God cannot be subject to humanly contingent occurrences. The new Jewish God, i.e. ‘the Jew’, just re-writes fables that serve the tribe at any given time. This may explain why the Holocaust religion is protected by laws, while every other historical chapter and narrative is debated openly by historians, intellectuals and ordinary people
As one may guess, with such a self-centered intensive world-view, not much room is left for humanity, grace or universalism. It is far from being clear whether Jews can collectively recover from their new religion. However, it is crucial that every humanist stands up against the holocaust religion that can only spread misery, death and carnage.
(1) Unlike President Obama who postponed his Far East trip just to meet Israeli PM and sent his Secretary of State to appease his Jewish opponents promising more confrontation with Iran, Hitler actually reacted furiously to Jewish pressure.